Perspectives

Title IX Equality

Share this article

In a written ruling a U.S. District Court Judge has ruled that the University of Cincinnati did not violate the gender equity requirements under Title IX by eliminating the University’s women’s crew team.

The rowing team which was made a varsity sport by the university in 2000 in part to meet Title IX requirements accused the university of shortchanging the team on equipment, training facilities and coaches and said that they had received less support than comparable men’s teams had.

At that time the university had drawn up plans to build a $3 million dollar boathouse on the Licking River in Wilder, Ky that was to be partially funded by a $1 million donation from a trustee. The plan was dropped in 2004 when cost estimates rose to nearly $6 million.

The lawsuit also charged that the crew coaches are underpaid and that the team doesn’t get a certified trainer to travel with them and that other male teams get priority for use of common facilities.

Judge Thomas S. Rose ruled against the team though because he noted that that percentage of female athletes at the university was higher than the percentage of female undergraduates which is a central formula of Title IX compliance.

Also even though the team now only has club status they have access to a new athletic training center which undermined their claim of unequal facilities.

What the women’s team apparently didn’t understand is that Title IX doesn’t guarantee that a particular women’s team is guaranteed the right to exist without regard to finances. The university did the right thing in this case by simply replacing the crew team with another varsity sport, women’s lacrosse which helped keep the school in Title IX compliance and reduced their costs as well. Can anyone fault the school for trying to reign in spending?

This is probably of little comfort to the crew team that lost it’s varsity status and school funding, but they have now learned that Title IX can be a two-edged sword. In this case the sword cut through the heart of the team.

Don Irvine is the chairman of both Accuracy in Media and Accuracy in Academia.

Don Irvine
Donald Irvine is the chairman of of Accuracy in Academia (AIA), a non-profit research group reporting on bias in education. Irvine follows his father’s legacy, Reed Irvine, to critically analyze the liberal media’s bias and brings over thirty years of media analysis experience. He has published countless blog posts and articles on media bias, in context of current events, and he has been interviewed by many news media outlets during his professional career. He currently hosts a livestream weekly show on AIA’s Facebook page which discusses current events. Irvine graduated from the University of Maryland and rose up the ranks to become chairman of Accuracy in Media until his transition to AIA. He resides in the suburbs around the nation’s capital and is a proud father and grandfather.

Sign up for Updates & Newsletters.

Recent articles in Perspectives